-
Website
http://blog.adaptiveblue.com -
Original page
http://blog.adaptiveblue.com/?p=1019 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
jonknight
44 comments · 11 points
-
ccqdesigns
15 comments · 1 points
-
Fraser
248 comments · 25 points
-
howardlindzon
4 comments · 71 points
-
patwoodward
8 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Updates to GetGlue.com: Improved Commenting and Navigation
2 weeks ago · 24 comments
-
Import Your Hulu Shows via iGlueHulu
4 days ago · 4 comments
-
Critic and Marathoner
2 weeks ago · 20 comments
-
Introducing Top Lists on GetGlue.com
1 week ago · 5 comments
-
Da Vinci
1 week ago · 7 comments
-
Updates to GetGlue.com: Improved Commenting and Navigation
I have two distinct points about this
1) Its not really about what is the right way. Increasingly it is more about what makes people happy. People are going to consume information in heterogenous, odd ways that make them happy.
2) The idea of pulling different conversations into 1 place is a solid one. In programming there is a concept of Model-View pattern, where a model is an underlying data set and the view is one way for looking at the data. We have evolved to the point where distributed conversation on the web is the model, and each of us is looking for an individual view - a lens, or perspective through which to view it.
We need aggregators that aggregate and let us seamlessly emit thoughts back that end up at the right places across the web. The problem? Its hard to do technically and there is little incentive because fundamentally every business wants to be the owner of the bits.
Conversely, and also like air, if you allow them to circulate freely they are always refreshing and self-replacing.
Bits are to be used, not owned. N'est-ce pas?